Multi-Perspective Critique

Name: Multi-Perspective Critique
Author: NeoLabHQ

Multi-perspective review system using Multi-Agent Debate and LLM-as-Judge patterns with 3 specialized judges, debate rounds, and consensus building

ByNeoLabHQ

Home/Ai/Multi-Perspective Critique

WhatIsIt

Multi-perspective review system using Multi-Agent Debate and LLM-as-Judge patterns with 3 specialized judges, debate rounds, and consensus building Built for use cases involving critique, multi-agent-debate, llm-as-judge, quality-review, consensus.

HowToUse

KeyFeatures

Multi-perspective review system using Multi-Agent Debate and LLM-as-Judge patterns with 3 specialized judges, debate rounds, and consensus building
Seamless integration with Claude's development workflow
Comprehensive guidelines and best practices for multi-perspective critique

ViewOnGitHub

GithubStats

Stars

Forks

LastUpdate

Author

NeoLabHQ

License

GPL-3.0

Version

1.0.0

Features

RelatedSkills

MoreFrom

Agent Evaluation Framework

Comprehensive Claude Code agent evaluation framework with multi-dimensional scoring, LLM-as-Judge mode, and research-backed performance variance analysis

Dev

Execute and Judge Loop

Single-task execution with LLM-as-Judge verification in an iterative loop, supporting auto-retry and strict orchestrator role separation

Dev

LLM-as-Judge Evaluator

Standalone LLM-as-Judge evaluation tool with context isolation, Chain-of-Thought scoring, multi-dimensional weighted rubric, and evidence-backed assessments

Dev